4 ms·
Last year was the first year I owned (and regularly used) a car, which made me think about mitigating my carbon footprint a little bit more seriously than payin
by tinco 7y ago
Last year was the first year I owned (and regularly used) a car, which made me think about mitigating my carbon footprint a little bit more seriously than paying the 'carbon tax' on my flights.
Like David says the offset projects all seem kind of snake-oil'y, so I looked for something that actually changes something in the world for the better. So far, building green infrastructure seems attractive, but I fear that in the end it just makes energy a little bit cheaper for people, and the real CO2 impact that happens in the transport and agriculture sectors doesn't really get solved.
I also was attracted to planting trees, since there's a very concrete impact there, that can't really be cheated against (unless people burn them down of course). So I started calculating how many trees to plant and it turns out that there's a lot of misleading info.
For example, in ideal conditions a tree might accumulate 20kg of CO2 in 40 years. My car did 16000km at about 1/14, on gasoline so that's 2742kg of CO2. So some website will tell me to plant 140 trees to compensate over 40 years, to compensate what I did in 1 year, assuming all those trees survive.
But they don't, only 55% lives, so I should plant 280 trees to be a bit more sure I really am compensating. And then it'll be compensated in 2060, which is useless because climate is changing now, not in 40 years. So it's better to compensate up front, so say I want to make sure I've made an impact by 2025, I should plant 8 times as many trees, so that's 2240 trees, and that's just assuming they grow linearly, which they probably don't do. And that they are planted in the tropics, which they probably aren't, and even if they were there's a risk they would be burned down for agriculture within the decade anyway.
And that's just me with an under average commute driving a mediocre car.
Does anyone have a better solution for offsetting carbon? Maybe we should pool money together and buy someone that's driving a range rover a tesla..
- revax 7y ago>For example, in ideal conditions a tree might accumulate 20kg of CO2 in 40 years. Are you sure it is not 20kg of CO2 every year for 40 years? After all, dry wood is half carbon approximately.
- tinco 7y agoWoops you're totally right, so that's shaves off a lot. I found a resource that says a young tree captures about 5kg per year. The 20kg per year figure is for a 10 year old tree. That brings it down to having to plant about 110 trees every year for 5 years.
- AstralStorm 7y agoThere is no way to offset carbon currently, the programmes that try to handle carbon recapture are in infancy or snake oil or just do not work. The best we could do is to scrape the car and go high efficiency electric. And switch to public transport where applicable, bulk deliveries rather than couriers for transport. Local products to limit total transport too. Ultimately, we will have to devise a plan for food production and water availability to continue on hotter planet, and making the conditions comfortable without contributing to the problem. (passive air conditioning, building design etc.)