3 ms·
By their own admission, they fail to quantify their findings. So, my issue is that they’re sound bites that a lot of people were predisposed to agree with (eg “
by lvh 7y ago
By their own admission, they fail to quantify their findings. So, my issue is that they’re sound bites that a lot of people were predisposed to agree with (eg “American healthcare is bad and expensive”) and therefore unlikely to evaluate critically.
People have also argued the opposite: the US is special because we have large natural borders (mostly). Or maybe the US is special because the US has a large Chinese-American population, many of whom travel regularly.
Epidemiology is a science. Why listen to Twitter randos when you have specialists?
- blaser-waffle 7y agoWhy listen to HN randos for that matter? (Counterpoint: HN has a huge selection bias for educated, technical types and a higher overall pool of talent. Doesn't mean disinformation campaigns and marketing won't work on this crowd, though)
- lvh 7y agoSure! If the thread had been posted on HN I'd raise similar skepticism :)