> Functional remote teams are better at communicating, yes, but that's survivorship bias I agree with this, I just don't think that factor has any practical re

> Functional remote teams are better at communicating, yes, but that's survivorship bias I agree with this, I just don't think that factor has any practical relevance to this particular discussion. Remote companies that aren't good at communicating are dead companies, and dead companies don't hire anybody. So what's the point in even considering them in this type of discussion? In this case survivorship bias is just filtering out irrelevant noise. If a remote company is hiring, then you can be pretty confident they are good communicators. With the exception of extremely early-stage companies of course, in which case all bets are off.