3 ms·
Prior art? 2009 - http://www.randomwire.com/storing-sensitive-data-in-the-cloud http://www.randomwire.com/storing-sensitive-data-in-the-clou... 2008 - http://
by bayareaguy 16y ago
Prior art?
2009 - http://www.randomwire.com/storing-sensitive-data-in-the-cloud http://www.randomwire.com/storing-sensitive-data-in-the-clou...
2008 - http://firmit.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/truecrypt-virtual-encrypted/ http://firmit.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/truecrypt-virtual-enc...
- masklinn 16y agoStop that, it's very silly: http://news.swpat.org/2010/03/transcript-tridgell-patents/ http://news.swpat.org/2010/03/transcript-tridgell-patents/
- bayareaguy 16y agoCare to elaborate in your own words why you think so? I will be quite peeved if something I have been doing for years with combinations of tools like Dropbox and Truecrypt becomes more difficult or costly to me or my customers due to a patent like this one.
- caf 16y agoBasically, it comes down to: the claims in patents are interpreted very narrowly. If your device/method doesn't exactly match the claim elements of the independent claim(s) in Apple's patent - even one little difference in implementation is enough - then your device/method is not infringing. Don't worry, be happy.