Thanks for the long post! That makes a lot more sense. I would say it's less that there was a scarcity of media in the past and more that there is now an unpre

Thanks for the long post! That makes a lot more sense. I would say it's less that there was a scarcity of media in the past and more that there is now an unprecendented and almost inconceivable overabundance of media. People gorge themselves on crap and have no remaining appetite to savor delicacies. But that might just be my provincial and elitist 20th century point of view. Anyway, we seem to basically agree.