3 ms·
As someone that started "programming" very early on (when I was 9 years old) and noticed over the years the huge advantage I had over my peers in terms of "thin
by d1zzy 7y ago
As someone that started "programming" very early on (when I was 9 years old) and noticed over the years the huge advantage I had over my peers in terms of "thinking as a computer" I can definitely say that experience matters. But it's most definitely not all that matters, not even the most important thing after a certain point:
* other people may be faster learner and may forget less
* other people's interest in the subject matter may decrease at a slower pace than mine's
* other people are simply younger and their body can be "fully awake" for more time, have more energy available to learn (instead of dealing with family issues), their brain is healthier/younger
There's also a unintuitive negative effect of having expertise: you easily miss out the simple explanations/solutions. This makes total sense, the more things you about a subject matter the more your brain will attempt to explain behavior through those means. As you become an expert in a subject matter you deal with more specialized/detailed aspects which results in your brain trying to think about those to explain situations or find solutions when a "newcomer" will very easily figure out that it's a simple problem/solution that can be done.
So don't feel disheartened, there are pros and cons to being at every level of expertise, it's a tradeoff.
- BigHatLogan 7y agoYou brought up some really good points. Your second point about interest--that's a great point. I think interest--and, subsequently, focus and attention--are force multipliers, especially in a field like programming, where experience and expertise don't just help you lay more bricks, but actually increase how many bricks you can lay in the same unit of time as before. The negative effect is interesting. I've heard it said before that non-experts often come up with novel solutions in some fields. That might because of what you pointed out, that the experts are too focused on a certain range of solutions, so they might be missing out on a range that a "layman" can easily identify.