How is this relevant to the article? What you're saying is totally defensible with regards to second hand smoke. Vapor is not smoke. Full stop. Furthermore, t

How is this relevant to the article? What you're saying is totally defensible with regards to second hand smoke. Vapor is not smoke. Full stop. Furthermore, this very article dispells the misconception that second hand vaping is an issue. Apologies if you're just merely presenting your views on a related subject, but based on the context, it does seem you're mistakenly equating second hand smoke with second hand vapor.