2 ms·
Hello there, thanks for the response. It would be impractical to calculate all the location factors in the world On the one hand I absolutely agree with you h
by dvtrn 7y ago
Hello there, thanks for the response.
It would be impractical to calculate all the location factors in the world
On the one hand I absolutely agree with you here, however I searched for multiple cities in the state of consideration, two of them are international destinations on the Atlantic coastline with considerable economic impact to the state and region at large, and as mentioned one of them is the state Capitol with nationally recognized colleges, I'm just a bit surprised that not this city is represented in your calculation.
That said, I do hope that area is improved on at least for the sake of other potential applicants.
Cheers!
- alexhutcheson 7y agoDid you see that "South Carolina" is an option in the drop-down? It has a value of 0.7, which seems pretty generous: it's higher than New Jersey (0.633), and is the same as Atlanta, Charlotte, and Connecticut (0.7), all of which have higher cost-of-living than most parts of South Carolina. The fact that the urban areas of South Carolina aren't broken out actually seems better for anyone who would plan to live in a rural part of the state. By comparison, "Everywhere else, Georgia", "Everywhere else, North Carolina", and "Everywhere else, Virginia" all have a multiplier of 0.633. This seems to indicate that you'd get paid about ~10.5% more in rural SC than you would in other rural places in the SE.