4 ms·
> I actually just mean DARPA NASA is the obvious next example. They pay for a lot of esoteric stuff that once made they don't actually end up needing - but hav
by SolarNet 7y ago
> I actually just mean DARPA
NASA is the obvious next example. They pay for a lot of esoteric stuff that once made they don't actually end up needing - but having paid the startup costs - end up contributing to other fields.
I think FEMA also does similar things though at a much less parallel (but a higher volume).
Most of the "regulate and promote an industry" (a dumb idea for structuring them but I digress) agencies also do this. The NRC for example does a lot of research on storing and recycling nuclear waste, but also on new nuclear technologies.
And other military agencies aren't worth leaving out. The army core of engineers pushes a lot of contractors to deliver unique solutions that end up getting resold, see the concrete barriers in Iraq.
- killjoywashere 7y agoIARPA, DTRA, SCO, DIU. The DoD spends like 50B a year in research and development. NIH and CDMRP grant programs is several additional billion.
- mattkrause 7y agoNIH is about 40 billion, and does a lot less development.
- rossdavidh 7y agoNASA had, at one time, a "cheaper, smaller, faster" strategy, which they then abandoned the first time it resulted in a mission failure. If they had the 90% failure rate of many VC's, betting on lots of 100x but only 10% of the time startups, they would have been shut down.