4 ms·
Sure it could be even worse, but is that supposed to be a rationale for accepting his approach? Just don't understand what point you are trying to make.
by gwright 7y ago
Sure it could be even worse, but is that supposed to be a rationale for accepting his approach? Just don't understand what point you are trying to make.
- vkou 7y agoThat you are being incredibly hyperbolic and alarmist when you are equivocating what are minor tweaks to what is, and what will remain a mixed public/private market economy... to full-blown-complete nationalization.
- gwright 7y agoI think you are misinterpreting the scope of what Sanders is proposing.
- JMTQp8lwXL 7y agoCould you please point to any evidence of Sanders plans to replace a market economy with an entirely centrally planned economy? That's essentially been your assertion, and I'm not familiar of any sources making this claim.
- gwright 7y agoHere is a discussion re: energy sector https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/02/bernie-sanders-climate-federal-electricity-production-110117 https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/02/bernie-sanders-clim... And here is a report about his statements over the years to nationalize various industries: https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/14/politics/kfile-bernie-nationalization/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/14/politics/kfile-bernie-nationa... There doesn't seem to be any limiting principle to way that Sanders approaches public policy.