4 ms·
For a long time I was written off by government and industry as a lone maverick with a chip on his shoulder. But things have changed a lot over the last year, f
by sofarfromhome 7y ago
For a long time I was written off by government and industry as a lone maverick with a chip on his shoulder. But things have changed a lot over the last year, first with the report by the Environmental Audit Committee in July which agreed with my findings and bollocked the Department for Business to get on with changing things. Second - and having massive effects behind the scenes but coming more into play - was the formation of a contaminants group in the FBU. The two guys behind it were outraged to discover only recently (and much of it from my website) that for 30 years they've been exposed to massively toxic fires without even been told about it by their management. Part of the problem there is corrupt fire safety officials in the pay of the flame retardant industry.
So in a short space of time, we've had people running for cover, resigning from committees and being axed from their jobs for corruption.
What else will move things on? Get your MP to write to the Department for Business. I met them yesterday and while they're crapping themselves about the attention that's now on them, they admitted that in effect they're not going to make any changes to these Regulations for another 9-12 years. I spelled out to them that that means we're going to continue poisoning our children as they sleep but these people have segmented minds and somehow avoid taking any responsiblity, concerned only about their careers and pension.
- buckminster 7y agoFBU = Fire Brigades Union
- sofarfromhome 7y agoThanks. A guy called Dave Sibert was for years the full time paid FBU rep for fire safety. He played a major role in blocking changes to the Furniture Regs, which would have hugely reduced flame retardants. It was pretty common knowledge he was in the pay of the industry; indeed, Matt Wrack of the FBU finally sacked Sibert for colluding with industry. The guy is a sociopath: he was actually prolonging a situation that poisons his own people on a daily basis, for personal profit.
- jl6 7y agoHeavy claim against a named individual... can you back it up?
- easytiger 7y ago> Part of the problem there is corrupt fire safety officials in the pay of the flame retardant industry. What's the evidence for this claim?
- surewhynat 7y agoApproving carcinogens for residential use.
- easytiger 7y agoHow is that evidence of the claim?
- wizzwizz4 7y agoThe alternative is that they're just that evil, that they're doing it for the lolz. So no, it's not strict evidence.
- portlander12345 7y agoOr they don’t believe the compounds are dangerous, or they don’t think they’re dangerous enough to outweigh the reduced risk of fires.
- easytiger 7y agoYea that's the only option. And certainly a complete representation of what happened
- sofarfromhome 7y agoI provided some above. The names are well known within the fire sector and they've not denied it. There are two ex-firefighters on record (BBC interview, online records) who were heavily funded by the flame retardant industry to push for more of their chemicals in furniture and other products. One of them still operates: Mike Hagen. Both claim that they were not funded while in service but logic suggests at the very least they were sounded out before retiring. Another still in service is Paul Fuller - who regularly pushes for flame retardants in children's clothing. Then there's Sir Ken Knight who played a major role in blocking safety changes to the Furniture Regs that would have hugely reduced flame retardants. The same Sir Ken who signed off the Grenfell cladding as safe; and the same Sir Ken who was appointed Chair of the Grenfell independent experts panel and refused to even look at the role the faile furniture regs played in the fire.