3 ms·
Even if you discount how morally wrong this is, cloning does not imply accelerated growth. Even if you started now, your (likely) involunatary donor will not be
by m4rtink 7y ago
Even if you discount how morally wrong this is, cloning does not imply accelerated growth. Even if you started now, your (likely) involunatary donor will not be ready for many years, likely long enough for your morally corupt self to be long dead due to organ failure by then.
- jcims 7y agoThe question was ‘Why would you invest a lot of time and effort into that?’ If you’re Kim Jong-un, why wouldn’t you build in a little insurance for 20 years down the road? The entire promise that no human has been cloned is suspect anyway. The only thing we can say for sure is that there’s no public record of it. But it’s been possible for quite some time and the likelihood that nobody has ever done it anywhere seems quite low. It’s way less ethical to artificially modify the genome of a human, and we know that’s happened already.
- perl4ever 7y ago"It’s way less ethical to artificially modify the genome of a human" It is? You are talking about the various attempts to treat illness in this way, or something else?