I wish I could get my organization to explore this a little more. We tend to use a single priority value. But it doesn't feel like prioritization to me. If you

I wish I could get my organization to explore this a little more. We tend to use a single priority value. But it doesn't feel like prioritization to me. If you have 100 issues that all have the same priority level, that means you don't care what order they're dealt with in - which is never really the case. There's invariably another level of "prioritization" that has to happen within each level. But instead of being codified, it gets left to casual discussion, or worse, it never gets discussed. This has led me to think that a hierarchical priority structure would be useful. So we could say that these 100 Level 3 issues are generally of the same priority, but there's a ranking within that. But even the highest among them is still less than the lowest Level 2 issue. That's not to say that it shouldn't also be 2-dimensional though.