That's the first time I've seen n=45,000ish been described as a 'poor' sample. The only suspicious part I can find is the peak at the first of February, but th

That's the first time I've seen n=45,000ish been described as a 'poor' sample. The only suspicious part I can find is the peak at the first of February, but that just seems like that date has been used as a catch all in case the exact date was unknown.