Similar level of interest and tracking, and I thought the same about CCP and their ability to enforce order, but this [1] gives an interesting counter argument,

Similar level of interest and tracking, and I thought the same about CCP and their ability to enforce order, but this [1] gives an interesting counter argument, with an interesting hypothesis [2] below: > Tufekci argues that one of the second order effects of a surveillance society is that people act strategically to minimise the chance of punishment - and so their behaviour (and the data it generates) ceases to be a good guide for policy. If there’s a strong incentive to suppress bad news, you won’t hear bad news, even when you need to. [1] How the Coronavirus Revealed Authoritarianism’s Fatal Flaw https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/02/coronavirus-and-blindness-authoritarianism/606922/ https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/02/coron... [2]https://www.getrevue.co/profile/mattclifford/issues/tib-103-can-machine-learning-save-communism-coronavirus-and-authoritarianism-how-to-save-science-and-more-229047 https://www.getrevue.co/profile/mattclifford/issues/tib-103-...