The article relies to a large extent on the blogs of cranks, if you click through to any of the sources, none of which are primary, you get derangement such as:

The article relies to a large extent on the blogs of cranks, if you click through to any of the sources, none of which are primary, you get derangement such as: https://missourieducationwatchdog.com/why-pokemon-is-not-a-go-and-how-is-google-involved/ https://missourieducationwatchdog.com/why-pokemon-is-not-a-g... I appreciate that people have privacy concerns, but this meter-long blog post is the result of just imagining a bunch of stuff that an evil company might do and then searching for a bunch of second-hand innuendo to support your hallucinations, in the tradition of people who have been ranting about gold-fringed flags on the Internet for decades. It doesn't advance the discourse and it isn't redeemed just by focusing on the boogeyman of the moment.