4 ms·
Would I be correct in the following examples of Meta-game: US Politics: - Stacking the supreme court Vs the court case strategy itself - Gerrymandering Vs Winn
by Paddywack 7y ago
Would I be correct in the following examples of Meta-game:
US Politics:
- Stacking the supreme court Vs the court case strategy itself
- Gerrymandering Vs Winning votes on merit
- How you play the Caucus nominations Vs policy
Business (internal to large companies):
- Gaming how funding flows vs Getting funding on merits
Business (external market)
- Finding the grey area in policy (e.g. Uber/ Airbnb)
- Lobbying
Would this be a correct understanding?
- smogcutter 7y agoMeta gaming isn’t the same thing as cheating (or exploiting a rules grey area). It’s not gaming the system vs playing it honestly. As far as I understand, the metagame is understanding how the rules reward certain strategies and over others, and how those strategies interact with each other. The reason the idea has so much currency in video games is that rules are constantly evolving as the game is updated and patched. So like for gerrymandering, the metagame aspect is understanding that under the current rules, gerrymandering is a winning strategy. Actually executing that strategy and gerrymandering a district is the playing the game-game part, not the meta-game.