I didn't change its meaning; I just pointed out what people feel. Yes, that stuff is not the FSF site, just like tax raises are not mentioned during election.

I didn't change its meaning; I just pointed out what people feel. Yes, that stuff is not the FSF site, just like tax raises are not mentioned during election. But Stallman is clear enought during interviews (emphasis by me): * “The free software movement aims for a social change: to make all software free..." - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/compromise.html http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/compromise.html * “Non-free software tramples your freedom. […] It's unethical and it should not exist.” -- http://multinationalmonitor.org/mm2004/07012004/july-aug04interviewstall.html http://multinationalmonitor.org/mm2004/07012004/july-aug04in... * Interviewer "If there was a button that you could push and force all companies to free their software, would you press it?" Stallman: […] But yes, I think all published software should be free software." - http://www.gnu.org/events/rms-nyu-2001-transcript.txt http://www.gnu.org/events/rms-nyu-2001-transcript.txt * Interviewer: "Would you accept a federal law in the United States to enforce the distribution of source code with every type of software?" Stallman: "I am not calling for such a law as of now, but I think that would be a valid consumer protection measure[…]" - http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_int...