3 ms·
>who don't really stand to gain that much more useful info about you from this than they already have that is absolutely untrue. Today they only have data for
by syshum 7y ago
>who don't really stand to gain that much more useful info about you from this than they already have
that is absolutely untrue. Today they only have data for websites already using CloudFlare Services.
DoH they can info on ALL websites users for FF visit. and while their "contract" with mozilla requires they "anonymize" the data, they are admitted to collecting aggregate data which is VERY valuable in itself, plus I never trust companies when they say they will "anonymize" the data
Further I have not see what if any penalties are imposed on cloudfare for any violations of the "contract" they have with Mozilla, if there are no penalties then the contract is pointless and not an assurance of anything
As to why people villify Cloudflare, it is what CloudFlare represents that is a problem for people like me. The Internet is best serviced by decentralization. in the last 10 to 20 years we have seen and continue to see MASSIVE centralization of core infrastructure.
FF move here represents another step on that path. CloudFare already has too much of the net behind their infrastructure.
They are an inherit threat to the free and open web