4 ms·

As we speak there is huge Hindu Muslim Riot going on in Delhi which was instigated by one of the BJP leader.

by acd10j 7y ago

cmonnow 7y ago
> instigated by one of the BJP leader sure, dream on. Muslims have been illegally occupying a public road for 2 months in the name of protests, against a law (CAA) which has absolutely nothing to do with them. The law helps State-sanctioned-persecuted religious minorities from neighboring countries, and these people have a problem with that.
- ak1234 7y ago
  Its called a protest. That's what happens all over the world when there is a protest. You occupy public space. Look up "Occupy Wall Street" or any other protest. Radical Hinduism is more dangerous than radical Islam. The harmless looking vegetarian upper caste Hindus who work in the next cubicle is nothing but a cauldron of hate and bigotry. After all they started practicing un-touchability and casteism before Westerners knew a continent called Africa existed.
  - wyoh 7y ago
    > Radical Hinduism is more dangerous than radical Islam Bold claim considering radical Islam is responsible for most of terrorist acts in the world.
    - jcranmer 7y ago
      > Bold claim considering radical Islam is responsible for most of terrorist acts in the world. Using https://www.start.umd.edu/sites/default/files/publications/local_attachments/START_GTD_TerrorismIn2018_Oct2018.pdf https://www.start.umd.edu/sites/default/files/publications/l... as my data source, I don't think radical Islam is responsible for a majority of terrorist acts. A plurality, yes; but they don't cross the 50% threshold I think. Note that half of the organizations responsible for more than 100 attacks each are not Islamist organization.
  - cmonnow 7y ago
    Anybody can protest anything. By your logic, those who are 'protesting' in support of the CAA must also be allowed to occupy public highways and disrupt everyone's lives. Just because democracy tolerates protests, it doesn't make the protestors automatically correct or moral. The 'minority' protestors are against a law that actually helps minorities of their neighboring countries. The hypocrisy is high.
    - ak1234 7y ago
      Why anyone needs protest to "support CAA"? Its already the law of the land...so what's there to protest? Gandhi united Indians against British. BJP/RSS and the Savarna Hindu bigots unite Hindus against Muslims and other minorities. Almost every action from Narendra Modi and the thug Home Minister Amit Shah - the Nicholas Maduro of India - is nothing but thinly veiled Islamophobia and bigotry.
- jcranmer 7y ago
  > The law helps State-sanctioned-persecuted religious minorities from neighboring countries If I recall the law in question correctly, it helps members of certain religious sects, while managing to exclude the one religious sect that is actually being actively persecuted by its government on a massive scale--the Muslim Rohingyas in Burma.
  - cmonnow 7y ago
    > actively persecuted by its government persecuted by government and persecuted by State-sanction(Constitution) are different. One government could decide it hates X group and persecute them, it doesn't mean the constitution of that country supports it.

As we speak there is huge Hindu Muslim Riot going on in Delhi which was instigated by one of the BJP leader.

by acd10j 7y ago

As we speak there is huge Hindu Muslim Riot going on in Delhi which was instigated by one of the BJP leader.

> instigated by one of the BJP leader sure, dream on. Muslims have been illegally occupying a public road for 2 months in the name of protests, against a law (CAA) which has absolutely nothing to do with them. The law helps State-sanctioned-persecuted religious minorities from neighboring countries, and these people have a problem with that.

ak1234 7y ago
Its called a protest. That's what happens all over the world when there is a protest. You occupy public space. Look up "Occupy Wall Street" or any other protest. Radical Hinduism is more dangerous than radical Islam. The harmless looking vegetarian upper caste Hindus who work in the next cubicle is nothing but a cauldron of hate and bigotry. After all they started practicing un-touchability and casteism before Westerners knew a continent called Africa existed.
- wyoh 7y ago
  > Radical Hinduism is more dangerous than radical Islam Bold claim considering radical Islam is responsible for most of terrorist acts in the world.
  - jcranmer 7y ago
    > Bold claim considering radical Islam is responsible for most of terrorist acts in the world. Using https://www.start.umd.edu/sites/default/files/publications/local_attachments/START_GTD_TerrorismIn2018_Oct2018.pdf https://www.start.umd.edu/sites/default/files/publications/l... as my data source, I don't think radical Islam is responsible for a majority of terrorist acts. A plurality, yes; but they don't cross the 50% threshold I think. Note that half of the organizations responsible for more than 100 attacks each are not Islamist organization.
- cmonnow 7y ago
  Anybody can protest anything. By your logic, those who are 'protesting' in support of the CAA must also be allowed to occupy public highways and disrupt everyone's lives. Just because democracy tolerates protests, it doesn't make the protestors automatically correct or moral. The 'minority' protestors are against a law that actually helps minorities of their neighboring countries. The hypocrisy is high.
  - ak1234 7y ago
    Why anyone needs protest to "support CAA"? Its already the law of the land...so what's there to protest? Gandhi united Indians against British. BJP/RSS and the Savarna Hindu bigots unite Hindus against Muslims and other minorities. Almost every action from Narendra Modi and the thug Home Minister Amit Shah - the Nicholas Maduro of India - is nothing but thinly veiled Islamophobia and bigotry.
jcranmer 7y ago
> The law helps State-sanctioned-persecuted religious minorities from neighboring countries If I recall the law in question correctly, it helps members of certain religious sects, while managing to exclude the one religious sect that is actually being actively persecuted by its government on a massive scale--the Muslim Rohingyas in Burma.
- cmonnow 7y ago
  > actively persecuted by its government persecuted by government and persecuted by State-sanction(Constitution) are different. One government could decide it hates X group and persecute them, it doesn't mean the constitution of that country supports it.