3 ms·
But i have to open a terminal to use t. I argue that using vim is more efficient then t: - delete a task 'dd' -> two keystrokes, no need to remember some arb
by buster 16y ago
But i have to open a terminal to use t.
I argue that using vim is more efficient then t:
- delete a task 'dd' -> two keystrokes, no need to remember some arbitrary id
- select a task 'gg' -> go to line number
- add new task 'o' -> one keystroke
- add a bash alias 't' for "vim ~/.tasks" and you have the power of vim and still need fewer keystrokes to manage tasks ;)
Still, why i would use such a tool is far beyond me, honestly.
I can understand using some advanced taskmanagers with GUI or a textfile, but i don't understand the benefits of t ;)
- RiderOfGiraffes 16y agoYou don't always have a terminal open? I find that odd. Personally I always have a terminal open - it's where I do most of my work - so to add a task it's just typing it in, preceeded by "t-". I don't have to remember arbitrary IDs, they are listed. But you're convinced it's of no value to you, and that's cool. Don't use it. But if you haven't tried it, can you really be sure?
- buster 16y agoActually i always have several terminals and several desktops open. I think my workflow would be to open a terminal on the "PIM" desktop and have vim running there. Anyway, you are right, i haven't tried it, and i probably won't because my workflow and taskmanagement works different (and already works for me). Everyone should use what suits him best.
- RiderOfGiraffes 16y agomy workflow and taskmanagement works different (and already works for me). Everyone should use what suits him best. Absolutely. This is just another option for those that aren't yet happy with what they do or have.