3 ms·
The problem is that the device (or website) also treats the owner and legitimate user as untrusted and obfuscates the content of the traffic in a way that makes
by buran77 7y ago
The problem is that the device (or website) also treats the owner and legitimate user as untrusted and obfuscates the content of the traffic in a way that makes everything completely opaque for them. The device/site only trusts its manufacturer which makes any device that completely obscures its traffic from its owner feel more like a Trojan horse. This is how you end up with questionable telemetry and data leaks for example.
What's a "trustworthy" device in this circumstance? If you can never verify then it's not trust it's faith and hope.
- JoshTriplett 7y agoIn what way does this argument not also suggest that the device should use plaintext HTTP so that you can intercept all its other traffic?
- buran77 7y agoWhat I want is a key to my own house, not an open door. Right now using a lot of software and IoT devices feels like buying a house but the builders keep the only key.