4 ms·
In this instance, the metagame is the optimal strategy given your gaming group’s current strategic preferences. I’ve found that over time, the dominant tactics
by shadowsun7 7y ago
In this instance, the metagame is the optimal strategy given your gaming group’s current strategic preferences.
I’ve found that over time, the dominant tactics in Splendor for my group swing between build and buy. People do whatever is necessary to win. Tactics used 50 games ago go away and then get brought back. People hold grudges against others over old games, and act to disrupt each other. All of this can be predicted and folded into game strategy.
I’ll admit, it’s a little difficult to see this type of meta in most gaming groups — my group happened to be my entire office, and we played Splendor every lunch break for probably a year. That’s hundreds of games within a small group of people.
- marcus_holmes 7y agoYou do see this in Chess, various openings fall in and out of favour over time. I guess you could call this "meta" - tactics change in line with strategy, strategies change in line with the meta game. But as GP says, I've always considered this as just "strategy". Made me think, though. Thanks :)