3 ms·
> The ideal would be a dynamic language with optional static typing but I have yet to see a language like that. That would be Common Lisp.
by siika2000 16y ago
> The ideal would be a dynamic language with optional static typing but I have yet to see a language like that.
That would be Common Lisp.
- davidk0101 16y agoI'm waiting for perl 6.
- stcredzero 16y agoThat would be Common Lisp. There was such a version of Smalltalk called Strongtalk, but it never got a community behind it.
- igouy 16y agoActually - "but then the Java phenomenon happened and we eventually had to switch to Java before ever releasing it". http://www.strongtalk.org/history.html http://www.strongtalk.org/history.html