2 ms·
It isn't about PG necessarily being great in everything he writes. It's that the readership of HN has his writings in common, possibly more than anything else.
by LanceH 7y ago
It isn't about PG necessarily being great in everything he writes. It's that the readership of HN has his writings in common, possibly more than anything else.
Some articles are on the front page to be read on their own or maybe even just to look at the pictures. Some are effective just for being a jumping off point for the discussion. Since what he writes about is so closely aligned with the readers here his articles almost always qualify for the latter, and occasionally for the former.
- dangus 7y agoReplace his name with Jim Bakker or Joel Ostern and everything you said still applies to their followers. The following of a personality in this way can lead to crappy groupthink.