3 ms·
> It's your right to withhold information just as it would be your right to withhold water if you had the only well in town Information is like the food in my
by unityByFreedom 7y ago
> It's your right to withhold information just as it would be your right to withhold water if you had the only well in town
Information is like the food in my example, not the "only water supply" in yours. Leibniz and Newton independently developed calculus, for example.
> you're thinking only of yourself. That's your right; take the low road if it makes you happy.
It's not selfish to be compensated for your work. Authors can choose themselves whether they want to make some of their work freely available, just as a market can give away some food or not.
- saagarjha 7y ago> It's not selfish to be compensated for your work. As far as I'm aware, authors get very little of the compensation for the work they're doing. > Authors can choose themselves whether they want to make some of their work freely available, just as a market can give away some food or not. Not if the established procedure for publishing is a journal.
- unityByFreedom 7y agoAuthor compensation depends on the author and their ability to strike a good deal for themselves, just like the rest of us when we apply for jobs, they do it per piece of work. As for journals, I understand the distaste academics have for these. This thread was about whether all published information should be free, not just journals.