3 ms·
It does make sense. You're just misreading what they said. They did not say information should be unfunded or creators demonitized. They said information shoul
by MacsHeadroom 7y ago
It does make sense. You're just misreading what they said.
They did not say information should be unfunded or creators demonitized. They said information should be "free" as in liberated, as in freedom.
Valuable information is virtually costless to copy and yet you can be locked away in a cage by men with guns for accessing it. It's not far off from how North Korea handles people found with Western media. That's what the commenter above is advocating against.
Have some perspective.
- unityByFreedom 7y agoPlease don't reply to every one of my comments with the same points, you are spamming.
- MacsHeadroom 7y agoI'm simply countering disinformation spam with correct information. Have a moment of self awareness for one second and consider this: if I had to make the same rebuttal multiple times to counter act the same argument then who is the spammer and who is just setting the record straight? Hmmmm
- r-w 7y agoThis is the equivalent of “If you want this conversation to end, why don’t YOU stop talking?” You already know the solution to the problem you’re having, which is to either make better points or stop inviting more replies.