3 ms·
It's worth noting that Go and Dart were characterized as "highly productive" whilst Rust wasn't.
by hu3 7y ago
It's worth noting that Go and Dart were characterized as "highly productive" whilst Rust wasn't.
- ShinTakuya 7y agoAbsolutely, I don't think any sane Rust zealot would argue that Rust can compete with Go/Dart productivity. The argument can be made that Rust code has a lower maintenance cost over time, though, and that productivity may not drop as much as the system becomes more complex. Even with this relative improvement, though, I question if it's enough to overcome the shorter compile and test loop the other languages have, or the mental overhead of managing lifetimes and ownership.