3 ms·
Another blockchain snakeoil. Look at one of the excerpts it's no different than today's way of doing things, where publisher needs to take the help of legal enf
by dragonsh 7y ago
Another blockchain snakeoil. Look at one of the excerpts it's no different than today's way of doing things, where publisher needs to take the help of legal enforceable contracts. Not going into technical details where today's distributed systems with immutable records are already very good to handle structured data from multiple sources without the unnecessary complications of blockchain. It's just convoluted way of repackaging how it works now. Hopefully instead of spending time on these things, hope research community can make it better to work with semantic data and build easier tools for managing it.
> Clients must pay for each query they send to AnyLog. Once a client obtains access to the result of a query, there are few effective technological mechanisms for preventing or constraining further disclosure. A client may attempt to resell the data they have access to or disclose it publicly. Therefore, publishers must take unauthorized disclosures into account when setting query prices or providing access to decryption keys. In some settings, relying on more traditional deterrence mechanisms such as legal contracts may be appropriate