4 ms·
This is how I'm precise where you're not: I'm literally quoting you and myself and you're just further adducing strange comparisons. So again I challenge you d
by throwlaplace 7y ago
This is how I'm precise where you're not: I'm literally quoting you and myself and you're just further adducing strange comparisons.
So again I challenge you directly quote my value judgments of the author. You can't though. Because none were made because my only point is that advice is facile for whom it is relevant and impractical for everyone else.
>Hey, I'm not saying anything bad about Jewish transsexuals...
I have no idea where you pulled this one from but let's run with it: if I saw comments and articles being written by Jewish Israelis about the impossibility for various reasons of the two state solution I would absolutely point that out without a shred of shame or cognitive dissonance.
>You (negatively) characterize people based on their race and gender and ascribe properties to them.
Show me where I ascribe a single negative property to the author? I explicitly said many many many times that the article is what I'm impugning. I said the writing is self-indulgent and the writing is self-aggrandizing. You can come to his defense all you want but he's not under attack - the facile categorical imperatives are.
Even if I weren't crystal clear in the initial comment every single one afterwards has underscored that I'm talking about the article. But you (and everyone that downvotes) willfully misconstrues in order to reaffirm their own allergy.
>very obvious and you deliver it with hostility and cynicism as if you were sharing verboten secrets.
I'll say it again: if that were obvious this post wouldn't have gotten traction.
Edit: you know what's beyond aggravating about having these meta-debates with people like you? The complete and utter lack of empathy on your part for anyone but this supposedly aggrieved/offended person.
Do you understand how obnoxious it is to come to hn and be ambushed by this kind of humble-brag jibbering? We don't all live in this world and it is all kinds of disappointing to read this constantly. I choose to avoid it on every other media channel (I don't use fb or ig etc).I don't understand why this stuff gets posted here under the guise of "startup culture". It's personal brand building! It belongs in an issue of people magazine rather than a tech site (there's nary a technical issue raised in the entire 1000 words). I say ambushed because I confused this person with Jeremy Kuhn and figured the article was going to be about np approximations.