I'm not equating them in all respects, it's just an example of something else where people disagree about whether a topic is a matter of legitimate debate, but

I'm not equating them in all respects, it's just an example of something else where people disagree about whether a topic is a matter of legitimate debate, but it seems reasonable for a universal encyclopedia to not pretend proponents don't exist. My point is that I can imagine Wikipedia including both lists, and I can imagine them not including either or both, depending on some consideration other than political bias. And it's not obvious to me what they should do, nor have I bothered to see what they have done.