The article reads like something generated by an AI. It fixates on a core idea (astronomers use the hubble), repeats it a number of times with minor variation,

The article reads like something generated by an AI. It fixates on a core idea (astronomers use the hubble), repeats it a number of times with minor variation, goes on unrelated tangents (sources of charged particles in general rather than as specific to this anomaly) and riffs on these themes in ways that make zero sense (astronomers controlling solar wind using magnetic fields? Unlikely). The title will probably be enough to drive millions of views, though.