Everyone is a leader implies a more flat organization, this isn’t that. This is just talking about effectively delegating and having layers of organization with

Everyone is a leader implies a more flat organization, this isn’t that. This is just talking about effectively delegating and having layers of organization within a team. Ie manager splits up the projects to project teams and a project leader and the leader with the team gets autonomy to run the project their own way with mentoring. I think it’s a good approach and for me at least orders of magnitude better than top down micromanagement. But the title I think just confuses things. Imagine that instead of “leaders” the smaller projects were their own teams and replace the leader with manager title and it’d be the same thing. EDIT: btw I see the lack of clarity around accountability play out at organizations. Where for instance on practice responsibility is split. Maybe the “leaders” set the direction and the team executed. But when it comes to accountability, like when something goes wrong, fingers get pointed to only the team or only the leaders without examining which piece (direction vs execution) failed.