3 ms·
And since 2017 (maybe 2016) they've publicly stated the blue checks are 'on hold', though it seems some people still get them sometimes? From the blue checks I
by geerlingguy 7y ago
And since 2017 (maybe 2016) they've publicly stated the blue checks are 'on hold', though it seems some people still get them sometimes?
From the blue checks I see in my timeline right now it seems like it's completely arbitrary who has them vs. who doesn't.
For example: A few journalists with hundreds or thousands of followers do, while others with same amount (all of whom I think are decent journalists) don't. Many organizations do (whether they have thousands or hundreds of thousands of followers, but some (with very recognizable names) don't. Some random individuals do, some don't, with follower counts in the hundreds to the millions.
The only thing it does for me is adds visual noise to the timeline. I can turn it off (in Tweetbot) and do, but I'm not sure what the point is currently.
- paulgb 7y agoAmong people I know, the distribution of blue checks is so arbitrary that I'm convinced we're all participating in some modern form of Stanford Prison Experiment.
- casefields 7y agoMy sibling is a journalist in DC. New hires at her paper get check marks right away. Seems like there's still a point-man that these new organizations contact. This is ripe for aa interesting article, but who wants to be the bad guy and end such a juicy perk?