4 ms·
I find sexual selection an interesting albeit in popular science literature underrepresented subject. It seems to me that this is the phenomenon that links thin
by stareatgoats 7y ago
I find sexual selection an interesting albeit in popular science literature underrepresented subject. It seems to me that this is the phenomenon that links things like fashion, infatuation and other cultural expressions to our biological evolution, and would explain the relative rapid adaption to various climates that humans obviously have gone though over the last 50 000 years or so, which the traditional evolutionary model (survival of the fittest) will have trouble explaining.
I'm sure this is no secret among professional evolution scientists, but this side of evolution has AFAICS not filtered into the general consciousness, for some reason that I have yet to figure out.
Maybe because it would give women a more important role than we so far have been willing to accept? Maybe because it would give animals an intuition and intelligence that we traditionally have denied them?
- everdrive 7y ago>Maybe because it would give women a more important role than we so far have been willing to accept? I'm not so sure this isn't broadly accepted. As far as I understand it everyone knows why the peacock has ridiculous (or beautiful, depending on your sensibilities) feathers, or why male birds are beautiful, while female birds are plain.
- econcon 7y agoReminds me of the article I read recently about Pharos of Egypt where royal males were consistently taller than average men and royal females were shorter than average female of the time. I wonder how can tall gene flow in a way that they are only expressed in a specific gender but not other?