3 ms·
I may have missed something, but I believe the T4s are running in the cloud, so it wouldn't have any effect on the car's power consumption.
by figo22 7y ago
I may have missed something, but I believe the T4s are running in the cloud, so it wouldn't have any effect on the car's power consumption.
- semi-extrinsic 7y agoTo clarify, I mean indirectly the power consumption. I guess this will become an important point of discussion soon-ish, as we get more and more electric cars and ML stuff in them. My view is, if your car uses electrons, and some of those are for compute, and you just offload the compute to the cloud, you haven't actually reduced the total electricity consumption. Similarly here, the total "footprint" of the car is increased by adding this feature.
- WrtCdEvrydy 7y agoTo be honest, there are open source ALPR (https://github.com/openalpr/openalpr https://github.com/openalpr/openalpr) that could probably run lower framerates even on modern i7 processors (http://doc.openalpr.com/getting_started.html#hardware-requirements http://doc.openalpr.com/getting_started.html#hardware-requir..., https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FNwEuJAgZ1LyM2GGd7VRJo85x99IFbecveO8rmFH1to/edit?usp=sharing https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FNwEuJAgZ1LyM2GGd7VR...)
- rejschaap 7y agoWhether the car uses electrons or fossil fuels is pretty irrelevant, right?
- speedgoose 7y agoI think the comparison with an electric car is to illustrate that this cloud solution is a waste of energy.
- Piskvorrr 7y agoFor a project that's intended to be a part of a car, cloud only makes sense for prototyping. 900 ms latency? Uh-oh.