4 ms·
It was based on the number of stars/forks and the size of the repository.
by danfox 7y ago
It was based on the number of stars/forks and the size of the repository.
- atxbcp 7y agoThere must be something else or something wrong, because you indexed one of my small repo (~100 stars, ~20 forks, ~20Mb) and not the bigger ones (~500 stars, ~100/150 forks, ~150Mb)
- giovannibonetti 7y agoMaybe he is limiting it to repositories of 50 MB or less, for example.
- patrickdevivo 7y agoor possibly there's a "time decay" element where more recently "popular" repos are prioritized, not just based on absolute start/fork count
- tempay 7y agoLooking around at repositories I'm familiar with this seems to be the case.