3 ms·
Agree with all you've written, just wanted to call out how Pollan painted the tension between Hubbard and Leary specifically. I'll check out the book Acid Dream
by roymurdock 7y ago
Agree with all you've written, just wanted to call out how Pollan painted the tension between Hubbard and Leary specifically. I'll check out the book Acid Dreams and I just ordered Electric Kool Aid Test to get a better understanding of the merry prankster scene.
I believe some of the 60's and 70's youth found sustainable ways to live outside the mainstream, but many of the communes/alternative living situations were volatile and corrupt. Take for example the Rajneesh community out in Oregon [1]...so much energy and potential channeled into a corrupt and ultimately destructive/pointless enterprise. The corporate way is the safe way in America, and I think many people were looking for safety in a confusing time when many alternatives looked bleak.
That said, this is just conjecture, I was born in the 90s so I have no first hand experience.
[1] great documentary on the Rajneesh: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wild_Wild_Country https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wild_Wild_Country
- pmoriarty 7y agoReligious leaders in general, especially ones that are all but worshipped by their devotees, have a really bad track record throughout history, and it's not limited to the 60's or psychedelic-inspired interest in alternative communities. What was different in the 60's and 70's is that more and more people started to be interested in Eastern religion, philosophy, and ways of life, and that interest was partially influenced by psychedelics. But plenty of non-Eastern alternative communities (particularly the apocalyptic, us-vs-them isolationist kind) have their own issues that have nothing to do with psychedelics or the 60's and 70's.
- failrate 7y agoI was taught at an early age to never trust anyone who wants power.