5 ms·
> "I checked: conscientious objection and religious reasons do not qualify” That’s not entirely accurate, though in practice it has been the case so far. Subs
by docdeek 7y ago
> "I checked: conscientious objection and religious reasons do not qualify”
That’s not entirely accurate, though in practice it has been the case so far.
Subsection 245(14) of the Electoral Act, and section 13A of the Referendum Act, provides that “the fact that an elector believes it to be part of his or her religious duty to abstain from voting constitutes a valid and sufficient reason for failing to vote.” [1]
That said, you’re right that concientious objection to voting (or a personal moral objection) is insufficient reason, and there is yet to be a religious duty that has been held by a court to be sufficient reason to avoid the obligation to vote. Indeed, I think it would be tough to think of a religion where a central tenet is “don’t vote”. Perhaps there is one, but it doesn’t come easily to mind.
[1]: https://www.aec.gov.au/About_AEC/Publications/backgrounders/compulsory-voting.htm https://www.aec.gov.au/About_AEC/Publications/backgrounders/...
- schoen 7y agoI believe Jehovah's Witnesses have an official, explicit religious teaching against voting and that their rejection of secular government authority is pretty core to their religion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehovah%27s_Witnesses_and_governments https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehovah%27s_Witnesses_and_gove...
- docdeek 7y agoIndeed, it seems you are right. I am a little smarter than I was before - thank you. :)
- cmroanirgo 7y agoI called the Electoral Commission about this. My wording is correct wrt to de-registration. The alternative is to not vote, wait for the 'fine' to come in and then declare reasons on why your 'fine' should be lifted. This was also explained to me on the same call. The whole phone call was highly skewed towards: you may as well vote (even informally), as it's easier.