Public debates about these matters are a good thing. It's not a waste of time to challenge claims & to help people understand the claims. Think of this as crowd

Public debates about these matters are a good thing. It's not a waste of time to challenge claims & to help people understand the claims. Think of this as crowd sourcing the peer review process to the broader interdisciplinary public. Here's Heller's response to the video you posted https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjdT-NdSoWM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjdT-NdSoWM Cheers!