So as long as you're dividing by the number of pieces, then that means the sets cost less? But actually the sets cost more, not less. The article also seems t

So as long as you're dividing by the number of pieces, then that means the sets cost less? But actually the sets cost more, not less. The article also seems to assume that the price increase is due to intrinsic manufacturing costs of adding more pieces, and is not simply a marginal increase in the wholesale price. In other words, there is no reason to assume the piece count is causal in the price from a materials perspective. There could just as well be a correlation that they know they can charge more when the piece count is higher.