2 ms·
Hmm. I don't agree with you on the fact that almost everything will have some easy to map analogous precedent / law clause. But I do appreciate the fact that I
by hnews_account_1 7y ago
Hmm. I don't agree with you on the fact that almost everything will have some easy to map analogous precedent / law clause. But I do appreciate the fact that I know literally nothing about law and that any fantastical suggestions I make would be ignorant at best, like you point out.
- jacques_chester 7y agoThe flip argument is that new cases arise constantly and that the law is always encountering totally novel circumstances. But by and large, most things have been done, or some echo has been. It's just that the novel stuff gets more press.