4 ms·
From a privacy perspective, that's even more horrifying. You leave in the unique identifier, and then publish it under your real name, allowing all of those cl
by saalweachter 7y ago
From a privacy perspective, that's even more horrifying.
You leave in the unique identifier, and then publish it under your real name, allowing all of those clicks to be attributed to your actual identity.
- quicklime 7y agoFrom a privacy perspective, is that really that bad? You've got a bunch of other people's clicks messing up your marketing profile. This might even be a good thing, because it pollutes the dataset that the adtech people are using, which makes the trackers less useful. So here's a feature suggestion: instead of removing URL parameters, replace them with a randomly-generated value. Be careful to use the same length and character set (e.g. replace a hex id with only hex digits). And also, set DNT=1. That gives the digital marketing people an incentive to respect the DNT header, and an easy way to maintain data quality. I think that this is a better strategy than blocking trackers and "cleaning" URLs. It shifts the economics of web tracking, which short of legislation, is the only way things are going to change.