6 ms·
> I'm surprised to see the NY Times have such clickbait-ish headlines. It stopped being a prestigious broadsheet long ago. The active anti-Trump coverage (and
by l33tbro 7y ago
> I'm surprised to see the NY Times have such clickbait-ish headlines.
It stopped being a prestigious broadsheet long ago. The active anti-Trump coverage (and I'm anti-Trump) is just cannibalizing their remaining credibility, which is derived from the interesting investigative work they still do from time to time.
- mcphage 7y agoHow on earth do you think they should be covering him?
- l33tbro 7y agoThe Times is committed to a larger arc about Trump [1], meaning each story reported is colored by a per-determined narrative [2]. While I may agree with them that Trump is a boob, this approach is intellectually dishonest and lacks the journalistic integrity that the paper was built on. I'm not an editor, so I'm not going to give you a bullshit internet opinion of how they should do their job. I will say that media organizations such as the LA Times and BBC seem much better at reporting the information as it is, and letting me form my own conclusions. [1] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/reader-center/impeachment-editorial-board.html https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/reader-center/impeachment... [2] https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/14/business/media/trump-news-media-editorials.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/14/business/media/trump-news...