> I feel I was being quite concise. And so does the OP, I'd wager. Personally I found the basis of the OP's criticism sufficiently self-evident to not require

> I feel I was being quite concise. And so does the OP, I'd wager. Personally I found the basis of the OP's criticism sufficiently self-evident to not require dissertation. If you didn't, that's fine too—but it's lazy criticism to declare that because YOU formed a different opinion that the OP was being lazy.