> but the total cost would still be in the 10s of trillions of dollars Source? The linked study gives it at $3.034 trillion/year. That's on the lower end, but

> but the total cost would still be in the 10s of trillions of dollars Source? The linked study gives it at $3.034 trillion/year. That's on the lower end, but consistent with all other studies for single-payer healthcare I've seen, which price it in the $3-$5 trillion/year range. Note that the US is already spending $3.5 trillion/year on healthcare.