4 ms·
If you have a reasonably middle-class income, the plans are prohibitively expensive and unbelievably shitty. I'm only anecdotal, but by comparison, prior the A
by megiddo 7y ago
If you have a reasonably middle-class income, the plans are prohibitively expensive and unbelievably shitty.
I'm only anecdotal, but by comparison, prior the ACA, my insurance for a family of 3 was $300/month with a $2500/year deductible. That $300/$5000 plan was considered predatory and high deductible.
The first plan offered to me under the ACA was something like $700/month with an $8000 deductible. Plans this year were ~$950/month with a ~$15,000 deductible. It's Cadillac pricing and one-star benefits.
Meanwhile, my "non-compliant, high deductible" plan from a private market is $400/month with a $5000/deductible.
I opted out of ACA - it made sense to opt out even when I had to pay the $2100/year penalty, because the premiums and the deductible were still less. I qualify as "underinsured", but that couldn't be farther from the truth. My plan can be irritating to use, but they have online self-service tools for providing healthcare, and I have never been questioned about paying for necessary treatments. I pay them, they pay the doc. Very simple.
For people who relied on private insurance and weren't destitute, the ACA has been a shit-show from day one.
The only highlight to the ACA for me is the hundreds of thousands in billables I've accrued helping institutions become "compliant" with the ACA.
- mrfusion 7y agoI’m curious what kind of plan you have now. Where did you find it? I thought plans had to be aca compliant.
- beefalo 7y agoDo you live in a state that rejected ACA funding?
- n9 7y agoCA resident here. My ACA plan for me and my son is 890 a month with subsidy and a 14k deductible per year. It’s bad.
- newguy1234 7y agoInteresting I didn't know it had those issues
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]