I understand the historical context of laws, my point was they are fundamental and we can believe them as fundamental truths. But those truths are layered, for

I understand the historical context of laws, my point was they are fundamental and we can believe them as fundamental truths. But those truths are layered, for example the world is round to a point but if holographic projection hold true, then it's true nature is not round at all. That being said there is enough foundational evidence to say that the earth is round is true, but I would not say the science is settled. Not until we answer the question of holographic projection. Some germs cause disease, some are actually extremely beneficial to us, so I would not say germs cause disease is settled. I believe that the science is settled is as strong of a statement as it conveys no more research or discovery is needed. No rules elevate my opinion over theirs, if anything mine should be regarded as less I don't hold my credentials out there as an authority.