2 ms·

That depends on the size of wreck you manage to cause, don't you think? In any case, it takes no more people to drop a brick than it does to sticker a sign. To

That depends on the size of wreck you manage to cause, don't you think? In any case, it takes no more people to drop a brick than it does to sticker a sign. To be clear, I find this entire concept of unsupervised robot vehicles both dangerous and absurd - even more so than the already dangerous and absurd baseline of a society so intimately bound up with automotive travel as ours. Exceeding such a high baseline as that is in its way impressive, and certainly demonstrates the astonishing overconfidence rampant in some segments of our very young and rather careless industry, but let's not get distracted from that essential point and waste our efforts on inconsequential arguments over whether a sticker is more dangerous than a brick.

capableweb 7y ago
> That depends on the size of wreck you manage to cause, don't you think? No, I think it's the scope of affecting many after another without doing something more. Throwing bricks requires continues action while a sticker is a thing you do once and then it "does it for you". See it as working every day and getting paid for that, versus a savings account where you get returns without really doing anything. And sorry, I didn't really join the conversations to argue against "concept of unsupervised robot vehicles [is] both dangerous and absurd " so I agree with the rest of your message.