> That's more of a matter of opinion than of fact. While the title is technically true, my initial interpretation was that Google was refusing to comply with a

> That's more of a matter of opinion than of fact. While the title is technically true, my initial interpretation was that Google was refusing to comply with a demand which they were legally obligated to meet. Turns out it was a request which they were well within their legal rights to deny. Sure, this is my opinion, but I'd definitely consider that to be a misleading title. This article is probably only on the HN front page because it is misleading. "Google denies request to provide documents in investigation of anticompetitive practices" is a better title.